Analysis of e-Government-Based Public Service Innovation in Enhancing Transparency and Accountability of Local Government in East Kalimantan

Authors

  • Kasmawati Kasmawati Universitas Muhammadiyah Kalimantan Timur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37899/np-ijpsm.v1i1.19

Keywords:

E-Government, Public Service Innovation, Transparency, Accountability

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the implementation of e-government-based public service innovation in enhancing transparency and accountability within local government administration in East Kalimantan. The research focuses on examining how digital public service systems contribute to improving governmental openness, administrative responsibility, and service effectiveness. This study employs a qualitative descriptive research method to obtain comprehensive insights into the implementation of e-government in local government institutions. Data were collected through interviews, observations, and documentation involving government officials, public service employees, digital system administrators, and members of society utilizing e-government services. The collected data were analyzed using the interactive model of Miles and Huberman, consisting of data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing.\n\nThe findings indicate that the implementation of e-government has significantly improved transparency by increasing public access to governmental information, service procedures, and online complaint systems. Digital platforms enable citizens to monitor governmental activities and participate more actively in evaluating public services. Furthermore, accountability has improved through electronic documentation, digital monitoring systems, and performance evaluation mechanisms that encourage greater responsibility among public officials. However, the study also identifies several challenges affecting the effectiveness of e-government implementation, including limited technological infrastructure, unequal internet access, low digital literacy, insufficient human resource capacity, organizational resistance to technological change, and incomplete system integration among government institutions. The study concludes that e-government-based public service innovation has positively contributed to strengthening good governance practices in East Kalimantan. Nevertheless, continuous improvements in infrastructure, digital literacy, institutional coordination, and organizational readiness remain essential to ensure sustainable and inclusive digital governance.
Keywords: E-Government, Public Service Innovation, Transparency, Accountability, Local Government, Digital Governance.

References

Abasilim, U. D., & Edet, L. I. (2015). E-governance and its implementation challenges in the Nigerian public service. Acta Universitatis Danubius. Administratio, 7(1).

Abisoye, A., Akerele, J. I., Odio, P. E., Collins, A., Babatunde, G. O., & Mustapha, S. D. (2020). A data-driven approach to strengthening cybersecurity policies in government agencies: Best practices and case studies. International Journal of Cybersecurity and Policy Studies.(pending publication). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2016.tb00542.x

Addo, A. (2018). Controlling government corruption through IT: An opportunity theory perspective.

Arey, H., Suripto, S., Hapsari, R. D., & Akbar, M. F. (2020). The Readiness of Disadvantaged Regions in Implementing E-Government in Indonesia: Case Study in East Seram Regency. TRANSFORMASI: Jurnal Manajemen Pemerintahan, 174-186. https://doi.org/10.33701/jtp.v12i

Aritonang, D. M. (2017). The impact of e-government system on public service quality in Indonesia. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 13(35), 99-111. http://dx.doi.org/10.19044/esj.2017.v13n35p99

Budiati, A. (2019, October). E-Government And E-Governance: Can Its Improve Indonesian Public Service Deliveries?. In Iapa Proceedings Conference (pp. 392-404). https://doi.org/10.30589/proceedings.2018.212

Cejudo, G. M., & Michel, C. L. (2017). Addressing fragmented government action: Coordination, coherence, and integration. Policy Sciences, 50(4), 745-767. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-017-9281-5

Cordella, A., & Tempini, N. (2015). E-government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in public service delivery. Government information quarterly, 32(3), 279-286.

Duţu, A., & Diaconu, M. (2017). Community participation for an open public administration: Empirical measurements and conceptual framework design. Cogent Business & Management, 4(1), 1287980. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2017.1287980

Febrianto, S. (2020, December). The State of Indonesia Needs Investment to Accelerate Infrastructure Development After New Normal Policies Due to Covid-19. In The 2nd International Conference of Law, Government and Social Justice (ICOLGAS 2020) (pp. 447-465). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201209.325

Fung, A. (2015). Putting the public back into governance: The challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public administration review, 75(4), 513-522. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12361

Huda, M. R., & Yunas, N. S. (2016). The development of e-government system in Indonesia. Jurnal Bina Praja, 8(1), 97-108. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.08.2016.97-108

Keramati, A., Behmanesh, I., & Noori, H. (2018). Assessing the impact of readiness factors on e-government outcomes: An empirical investigation. Information Development, 34(3), 222-241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266666916685603

Khizbullin, F. F., Sologub, T. G., Bulganina, S. V., Lebedeva, T. E., Novikov, V. S., & Prokhorova, V. V. (2017). The Direction of Transformation of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) at the Present Stage of Development into an Electronic and Information Society. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences & Humanities, 25.

Kompella, L. (2020). Socio-Technical transitions and organizational responses: Insights from E-governance case studies. Journal of Global Information Technology Management, 23(2), 89-111. https://doi.org/10.1080/1097198X.2020.1752082

Ksatrya, S. P. (2019). Development of maritime logistics system to support marine and fisheries integrated centres in small island and boundary areas (Doctoral dissertation, University of Essex).

Kusumasari, B. (2018). Digital democracy and public administration reform in Indonesia. International Journal of Electronic Governance, 10(3), 317-337.

Lindquist, E. A., & Huse, I. (2017). Accountability and monitoring government in the digital era: Promise, realism and research for digital‐era governance. Canadian public administration, 60(4), 627-656. https://doi.org/10.1111/capa.12243

Manenji, T., & Marufu, B. (2016). The impact of adopting e-government as a mechanism to enhance accountability as well as transparent conduct within public institutions. Scholedge International Journal of Business Policy & Governance, 3(7), 84-101. http://dx.doi.org/10.19085/journal.sijbpg030701

Maulana, R. Y., Bafadhal, F., & Firmansyah, A. (2019). E-Government Implementation: The Concept of Innovative Transformation of Leadership and Public Officials’ Capacities in Indonesian Open Government (The Case of Evaluating E-Government Utilization in Government Information Management in Jambi Province). Available at SSRN 3497307.

Mourad, L., & Piron, L. H. (2016). Municipal service delivery, stability, social cohesion and legitimacy in lebanon an analytical literature review.

Munzhedzi, P. H. (2016). Fostering public accountability in South Africa: A reflection on challenges and successes. TD: The Journal for Transdisciplinary Research in Southern Africa, 12(1), 1-7.

Othman, M. H., Razali, R., & Nasrudin, M. F. (2020). Key factors for e-government towards sustainable development goals. International Journal of Advanced Science and Technology, 29(6), 2864-2876.

Parris, D. L., Bouchet, A., Welty Peachey, J., & Arnold, D. (2016). Change is hard: overcoming barriers to service innovation. Journal of Services Marketing, 30(6), 615-629. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSM-05-2015-0182

Robinson, L., Cotten, S. R., Ono, H., Quan-Haase, A., Mesch, G., Chen, W., ... & Stern, M. J. (2015). Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, communication & society, 18(5), 569-582. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1012532

Ronchi, A. M. (2019). e-Government: Background, Today’s Implementation and Future Trends. In E-Democracy: Toward a New Model of (Inter) Active Society (pp. 93-196). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01596-1_5

Sarker, M. N. I., Wu, M., & Hossin, M. A. (2018, May). Smart governance through bigdata: Digital transformation of public agencies. In 2018 international conference on artificial intelligence and big data (ICAIBD) (pp. 62-70). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICAIBD.2018.8396168

Sigwejo, A., & Pather, S. (2016). A citizen‐centric framework for assessing e‐government effectiveness. The Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 74(1), 1-27. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2016.tb00542.x

Sijabat, R. (2020). Digitalization of local government in the decentralized era: An insight of the stage of e-government across provinces in Indonesia. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Inclusive Business in the Changing World–ICIBh. https://doi. org/10.5220/0008430402870296.

Sulistya, A. Q. W., Sulistiyo, B. B., Aditya, F., Aritonang, I. D., Simangunsong, S. A., Shihab, M. R., & Ranti, B. (2019, July). A case study of Indonesian government digital transformation: Improving public service quality through E-government implementation. In 2019 5th International Conference on Science and Technology (ICST) (Vol. 1, pp. 1-6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICST47872.2019.9166234

Tsetsura, K., & Luoma‐aho, V. (2020). Transparency and corruption in the public sector. The handbook of public sector communication, 71-79. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119263203.ch4

Utomo, R. G. (2020). Information assurance framework for eGovernment in Indonesia (Doctoral dissertation, University of Southampton).

Vosselman, E. (2016). Accounting, accountability, and ethics in public sector organizations: Toward a duality between instrumental accountability and relational response-ability. Administration & Society, 48(5), 602-627. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713514844

Waddington, H., Sonnenfeld, A., Finetti, J., Gaarder, M., John, D., & Stevenson, J. (2019). Citizen engagement in public services in low‐and middle‐income countries: A mixed‐methods systematic review of participation, inclusion, transparency and accountability (PITA) initiatives. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 15(1-2), e1025. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1025

Weerakkody, V., Irani, Z., Lee, H., Osman, I., & Hindi, N. (2015). E-government implementation: A bird’s eye view of issues relating to costs, opportunities, benefits and risks. Information systems frontiers, 17(4), 889-915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-013-9472-3

Downloads

Published

2020-12-17